Report on Latest Publisher Rejection
I got a rejection from Harper Collins for the first Tramp book, but with a long
analysis of why. I asked if she would read the revision and, to my surprise, she
said yes. So, I am revising with less telling, more showing, cutting the actual
talking between animals and humans, making it clear that animals talk to humans by "showing" them what
they feel, think and want. I keep animal to animal talking.
I went direct to the publisher, sans agent. I suggest that we share editor names since
thaey are very difficult to contact without an agent that sits on their doorstep.
Any thoughts on this?
Writing that kicks your ass
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Long analysis from the editor, her willingness to read the revision--excellent! She perceives the quality of your story!
ReplyDeleteHas her feedback helped how you envision the second book (which I can't wait to read more of, by the way!)?
Bill, way to go!
ReplyDeleteHer analysis has helped me with writing period. It helps me to read as a reader, not the writer. Cheryl B. Klein has a great book on editing/revising; "Second Sight." This is also a boost to the revision process.
ReplyDeleteThanks to Andy and Alan for their support!!
An analysis of your manuscript from an editor at Harper Collins, one of the top publishers in the world! Even though it wasn't an acceptance, I'd call that a pretty important life event, Bill! Congratulations. I hope you feel encouraged to pursue your passion even more.
ReplyDeleteCongrats, Bill. As the other guys have said, THIS IS A BIG DEAL! A close look and long analysis at your baby! Write on!
ReplyDelete